博客

超级管理员

67327

帖子

11

回复

212

积分

楼主
发表于 2020-01-05 12:17:22 | 查看: 1004 | 回复: 2

背景:

某985计算机专业研一学生,使用深度学习算法预测海水温度,算是计算机和海洋学科交叉,占比各50%。没有任何计算机技术含量和海洋学科专业知识,纯属搬运工…
没有任何论文写作背景和导师期刊圈子背景,纯属自己到处投稿碰壁,被拒,投稿…

2018.11.11-2019.2.1实验设计阶段

2019.2.14-3.25初稿准备阶段:

2019.3.25-4.24:期间共投了6家二区及一区海洋类期刊:

1.International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
2.Remote Sensing
3.AGU_Oceans
4.deep-sea research part i-oceanographic research papers
5.Canada JOURNAL OF remote sensing
6.JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS

纷纷被拒,连审稿环节都没有进,主编直接拒稿,要么不符合期刊主题,要么英文写作差…【反正各种理由就是不想让你进入审稿】。总结出:海洋类学科圈子极小,不是圈子人根本不要你,连想也别想。
1.
Thank you for your submission to Journal of Geophysical Research - Oceans. At this time, we feel that the content of your manuscript " is not within the scope of the journal.
Your paper presents an interesting new technique to determine subsurface thermal structure using neural networks, but it is entirely based on statistics and it is difficult to find any new insight into the physics or dynamics of the ocean. I regret to inform you that it has been declined for publication in Journal of Geophysical Research - Oceans.
We hope that you are able to have the paper published promptly elsewhere; a methods journal may be more appropriate.
Sincerely,
Kris Karnauskas
University of Colorado
Editor, JGR-Oceans

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Deep-Sea Research Part I. I regret to inform you that the manuscript cannot be accepted for peer-review in our journal. The main reason for rejection is the substandard language throughout the text. It’s not just the poor English. It’s the very awkward writing style that hinders comprehension. The entire manuscript has to be re-written aiming for utmost clarity. The CNN terminology used by the authors must be defined and explained to the broad oceanographic community.
We appreciate your submitting your manuscript to this journal and for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Kind regards,
Dr. Igor M. Belkin
Editor-in-Chief
Deep-Sea Research Part I

*Thank you for your interest in submitting your work to the Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing (CJRS). I briefly read your manuscript before initiating the formal review process. Noting your significant efforts invested in this study, I regret to say that, in my opinion, the topic of research addressed your study falls outside of the CJRS scope. The definition of aim and scope of CJRS is available at the following link . It says that the journal publishes topics related to “sensor and algorithm development, image processing techniques and advances focused on a wide range of remote sensing applications”. Although your study uses the satellite remote sensing data of the ocean surface at very high processing level (monthly means, 0.25deg x 0.25deg) as input, the main purpose of your research is the development of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method for estimation of subsurface temperature anomalies in the Pacific Ocean. In my opinion, your study fits better one of the journals focused on the ocean sciences or the neural network applications.
I would suggest also conducting an additional thorough editing of the English grammar and presentation style to increase the chance of positive outcome of the review process. In its present form, the manuscript is an easy target for very serious critique.
Sincerely yours,
Alexander Trishchenko,
Associate Editor, CJRS

2019.4.30:IEEE ACCESS第一次投稿

改投IEEE ACCESS【知名二区水刊,$1,750【专门赚中国人钱的】】:
IEEE ACCESS属于在线期刊,没有纸质版,一个月发行很多很多很多…篇,2019年发了1万多篇!!!一篇稿费1万多【跪了】,2016年是808篇,2017年是2325篇,2018年是6538篇。IEEE ACCESS的2019年影响因子(JCR2018)是4.098。妥妥是4分+的SCI期刊。据说被很多高校已经拉入黑名单了【至少我们学校还没有…】。
唯一优点:审稿速度巨快,一周时间会给你审稿意见。
据说挺好投,可能我水平实在太差,前后经历了4次审稿,每次审稿人都给出了很高水平的修改意见,相当的仔细,改的都怀疑这还是不是水刊…

2019.5.8:进入审稿阶段
2019.5.20:审稿意见:1个接受小修,2个拒绝鼓励重投,主编鼓励重投
3个审稿人整整慢慢的英文2页纸!!!提出的问题和意见水平都很高,从写作到数据到实验设计到算法的设计及实验结果,论文的配图方方面面都讲到了…感觉到了人生的绝望…

2019.6.6:IEEE居然叫我审稿一篇韩国人的论文,期间经历美国抵制华为:IEEE(全球电器与电子工程师协会)下令禁止华为专家参与期刊审稿,根据IEEE中的邮件,禁止华为员工、以及华为赞助的个人担任审稿人和编辑。中国学者纷纷退出审稿来抵制IEEE这个操作,让我这个刚刚有点希望的学术小白咋整…

***05-Jun-2019
Dear ******:
As a gentle reminder, you recently agreed to review Manuscript ID Access-2019-16767, entitled “Universal Pooling - A New Pooling Method for Convolutional Neural Networks,” and your review is due tomorrow, 06-Jun-2019.
To view the manuscript directly without logging into ScholarOne Manuscripts, click the following link:


Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of any assistance. We look forward to your valuable feedback on this manuscript.
Sincerely,
Dr. Haiquan Zhao
Associate Editor, IEEE Access
hqzhao@home.swjtu.edu.cn
If you have any questions, please contact article administrator: Ms. Shalu Dubey shalu.dubey@ieee.org***

2019.6.13又来一篇叫审稿,我服了,我的论文都他妈还没有消息呢就叫我审稿…估计中国学者退出的太多,实在找不到人审稿了…
***12-Jun-2019
Dear **:
As a highly regarded expert in the IEEE, I am hoping that you can review Manuscript ID Access-2019-15192 entitled “Boundary-aware CNN for Semantic Segmentation” with Dr. Zou as contact author, which has been submitted to IEEE Access.
The abstract appears at the end of this letter, along with the names of the authors. Please let me know within 2 days if you will be able to accept my invitation to review. If you agree to review, you will be asked to provide your review comments within 7 DAYS.
Please note that this quick turnaround is to maintain IEEE Access’ rapid peer review process. As a reviewer, you are asked to provide an Accept or Reject recommendation with comments.
IEEE Access publishes multidisciplinary articles, practical articles, surveys and reviews, as well as traditional technical articles. When reviewing the paper, keep in mind the following IEEE Access qualities:

  1. The article must be technically sound.
  2. The article must be original writing that enhances the existing body of knowledge in the given subject area. However, review articles and surveys are acceptable if they add value, even if new data/concepts are not presented.
  3. Practical articles are acceptable if they are useful to the engineering community on how to demonstrate a technology that may not be novel.
  4. The references that are provided must be applicable and sufficient.
  5. The title is applicable and appropriate.
    Additional information regarding the review process and scope of IEEE Access can be found at http://ieeeaccess.ieee.org.
    To reply to this reviewer invitation, please click the link below to register with our online manuscript review system, or you may email me with your reply. If you are unable to review at this time, I would appreciate your recommendation for another expert reviewer.***

2019.7.23:第二次投稿

经过两个月的大修,疯狂舔审稿人后第二次投出。整整回复了15页英文!!!!【论文才写了13页】

2019.8.4:审稿意见:相同审稿人:2个接受小修,一个拒绝鼓励重投
说实话这次审稿意见依然很有水平,问题都很深刻,没办法,继续改吧。
2019.8.5:主编尼玛又给你搞来一个审稿人,这是什么操作完全看不懂了,网上查找也没有这个操作,这就是4个审稿人了!!!!而且这个新的审稿人巨那啥,直接拒绝,提出这个实验从根本上就是错误!!!我尼玛…还能咋弄,硬舔了。
05-Aug-2019
Access-2019-
- *
Dear :
I received a new comments from your reviewer. I attached a pdf including the comments to this e-mail.
Sincerely,
Dr. aysegul ucar
IEEE Access

2019.10.11:第三次投稿

暑假期间经历了很多事,没有顾上论文,其实没有改多少东西,这个时间可以压缩至一个月就可以重投了。
10.17号编辑给我回复说每个作者都要有ORCID iD…跪了,又联系各个加名字的老师一一给注册ORCID iD…
10.23号编辑又说论文排版有问题…我。。。。之前咋个就没问题!!!!

2019.11.6审稿人意见:3个皆接受小修…第四个审稿人没有再出现!!!!(再出现估计还得投一波)。这次问题很小,一个周就改完了

2019.11.14:第四次投稿

2019.11.22审稿意见:只回复了两个接受,第二天直接邮件接受论文通知…

2019.11.23:上传最终稿

根据编辑给你的回信该放上的都放上就可以了:
1.Biographies and author photos
2.FINAL Article
3.Graphical Abstract【网站上需要你的一张能够概括整篇文章核心的图片,从论文里巴拉一张放上就行,然后写写说明就ok了,不是很严格】
4.Information for the Graphical Abstract
5.Manuscript【docx文件格式的,应该是编辑要给你排版用】

2019.11.26论文网站初稿刊登

应该是看看其他审稿人又意见没,没有意见我们可收钱了!!!!!

2019.12.1:交钱!!!!刊登

交完钱就正式在网站上刊登了…

2019.12.1-至今SCI库检索:【据说1-2两个月时间,谁知道呢】:

从2019.4.30-11.30前后经历了7个月,4次投稿…谁说IEEE ACCESS水刊啊,当然中间由于个人很多事情耽误了几个月,实际上可以缩减成4个月。但是4次重投还是很让人绝望的。
写论文不易,能混就混吧…

问题汇总:

1.写作润色:先写的中文,然后谷歌翻译的英文,然后更改了更改语法…说实话英文写作能力真的不行,期间在第二次投稿时使用论文润色机构润色了一次【基本就给你改了改语法然后就2000多,有一项服务是可以给你润色很多次,4000多,最好购买这种,后面审稿人每次都提出写问题,都是硬着头皮改的】


【科研人员聚集地,有期刊投稿问题上小木虫问或者搜索就行,手机APP也有】
2.排版:严格按照IEEE ACCESS双排的格式进行排版,不然后期改的让你吐血
3.参考文献:可以使用谷歌学术进行搜索


4.微信小程序:中科院文献情报中心分区表。可以查询期刊属于几区…
【这个网站需要学校老师提供账号,没有的用小程序就行】

5.写论文步骤:
【1】摘要:你干了什么事:研究区域,数据,方法,结果,对科学的贡献【吹牛皮】
【2】引言:其他科研人员干了什么,我干了什么,我的结果比其他人牛逼在什么地方,我的结果别人无法超越,就是很厉害很厉害
【3】数据:你实验数据的来源,如何处理的,怎么使用的
【4】方法:你的实验方法是什么,你怎么设计的,怎么实施的
【5】实验结果及分析:最好的结果,对应结果有什么现象,有什么贡献
【6】结论:和摘要差不多,但是字数要多写!!!!
【7】参考文献:严格按照期刊的参考文献格式添加就行了

以上纯属小白操作,有不对的地方欢迎提出和探讨

有关于IEEE ACCESS投稿问题的欢迎私聊探讨


本帖子中包含资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载,没有帐号?立即注册

普通会员

0

帖子

1

回复

7

积分
沙发
发表于 2020-06-28 22:49:46

你好,我想问一下,投稿的时候又要匿名,又要写人物传记,这是什么操作?写人物传记不就相当于不匿名了吗?

还想问下楼主,投稿时代码链接是不是也不能放?

求回答。感谢。

超级管理员

88

帖子

19

回复

251

积分
板凳
发表于 2020-07-02 15:59:27
渣渣渣渣渣硕 发表于 2020-06-28 22:49:46 沙发

你好,我想问一下,投稿的时候又要匿名,又要写人物传记,这是什么操作?写人物传记不就相当于不匿名了吗?

还想问下楼主,投稿时代码链接是不是也不能放?

求回答。感谢。

你好!本站投稿没有那么多要求!只要不涉及到 黄赌毒 基本都可以  可以带代码连接

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

2018-2020 ©v2.1 冀ICP备19027484号-1

点击这里给我发消息